MetaWin Output Feb 22, 2016 11:09 PM Data saved to Y:\Daten PC Joerg Prietzel\Ablage\Aktuelle Daten\Paper aktuell\Manu in Arbeit\Manuskripte B69\NGS neu\MetaWin Analysis OC Stocks Set 1+2 - Response Ratios.txt ------------------------------------------------------------- Feb 22, 2016 11:09 PM Data loaded from Y:\Daten PC Joerg Prietzel\Ablage\Aktuelle Daten\Paper aktuell\Manu in Arbeit\Manuskripte B69\NGS neu\NGS REVISED\MetaWin Analyse BGD Alm Basisdaten REVISED 22-2-16.txt 12 rows X 7 columns The first row contained column headers ------------------------------------------------------------- Feb 22, 2016 11:11 PM Calculation of Effect Sizes - ln Response Ratio Study Effect Variance ------------------------------ Study 1 0.0000 0.0008 Study 2 0.0000 0.0295 Study 3 0.0000 0.0018 Study 4 0.0000 0.0046 Study 5 0.0000 0.0000 Study 6 0.0000 0.0416 Study 7 0.0000 0.0010 Study 8 0.0000 0.0002 Study 9 0.0000 0.0050 Study 10 0.0000 0.0024 Study 11 0.0000 0.0158 ------------------------------------------------------------- Feb 22, 2016 11:11 PM Meta-Analysis Results Effect Size from column "lnR" Variance from column "Var(lnR)" Random effects model Resampling tests generated from 999 iterations NOTE: The estimate of the pooled variance was less than or equal to zero, therefore the data was analyzed using a fixed effects model. SUMMARY RESULTS Heterogeneity df Prob(Chi-Square) ---------------------------------------- Qtotal 0.0000 10 1.00000 Mean Effect Size 95% CI Bootstrap CI Bias CI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- lnE++ 0.0000 -0.0089 to 0.0089 0.0000 to 0.0000 0.0000 to 0.0000 E++ 1.0000 0.9911 to 1.0090 1.0000 to 1.0000 1.0000 to 1.0000 Sqrt Pooled Variance = 0.0000 Mean Study Variance = 0.0093 Ratio = 0.0000 ------------------------------------------------------------- Feb 22, 2016 11:12 PM Calculation of Effect Sizes - ln Response Ratio Study Effect Variance ------------------------------ Study 1 0.0419 0.0415 Study 2 0.0964 0.0171 Study 3 -0.2023 0.0073 Study 4 0.0389 0.0059 Study 5 -0.0277 0.0239 Study 6 -0.4447 0.0288 Study 7 0.4088 0.0056 Study 8 -0.0063 0.0218 Study 9 0.2259 0.0106 Study 10 0.0435 0.0052 Study 11 -0.5454 0.0178 ------------------------------------------------------------- Feb 22, 2016 11:13 PM Data saved to Y:\Daten PC Joerg Prietzel\Ablage\Aktuelle Daten\Paper aktuell\Manu in Arbeit\Manuskripte B69\NGS neu\NGS REVISED\MetaWin Analyse BGD Alm Basisdaten REVISED 22-2-16.txt ------------------------------------------------------------- Feb 22, 2016 11:13 PM Meta-Analysis Results Effect Size from column "lnR" Variance from column "Var(lnR)" Random effects model Resampling tests generated from 999 iterations Estimate of pooled variance: 0.0596 SUMMARY RESULTS Heterogeneity df Prob(Chi-Square) ----------------------------------------- Qtotal 10.1258 10 0.42953 Mean Effect Size 95% CI Bootstrap CI Bias CI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- lnE++ -0.0210 -0.2049 to 0.1629 -0.1839 to 0.1227 -0.1728 to 0.1285 E++ 0.9792 0.8147 to 1.1770 0.8320 to 1.1305 0.8413 to 1.1371 Sqrt Pooled Variance = 0.2440 Mean Study Variance = 0.0169 Ratio = 14.4744 -------------------------------------------------------------